270 reviews of Teaching House

Review 270 of 270 Teaching House

50%
Overall Rating
Course Content
Practice Teaching
Quality of Feedback
Lesson Plan Guidance
Instructor Competency
Job Assistance
Not Applicable
Facilities/Resources
Not Applicable

Going in order of each ranking above and explaining my answers to hopefully give those looking at Teaching House (TH) and this program in the future an inside look. I was part of the 10-week, online, part-time course.

Overall rating: The CELTA course work itself is fine, having come into this program with TEFL certification from my college I was aware of a majority of the methods and that some of them are outdated. The most valuable part of this course is actually being able to teach students. Structures are expected to be followed rigidly but there is very little assistance on how to actually structure a lesson. I will stand by the opinion that we should not have been thrown in to teach during the first two weeks, we absolutely should have those sessions dedicated to the tutors showing us how to make a basic lesson. The beginning of this course was hell and it didn’t improve until my last 4 weeks.

Course Content: As mentioned above, the content overall is fine if a bit dry and outdated. You are given coursebooks and assigned pages to make lessons out of, some of the activities will require some creative thinking in order to make an interesting lesson. The low rating here mostly comes from the disorganization of the Sharepoint (which contained all relevant assignment, teaching materials, and lesson resources) which hadn’t been updated since 2020, and the Moodule (where you did lessons) not registering assignments fully. You’re given Moodule assignments to complete each week (though they are flexible) but they often don’t register as completed 100% due to tech errors. It was asked by my group if this was ok and we were told on multiple occasions that they just wanted to see if we “did” the lesson, actually completing it wasn’t looked for. So the homework is busywork you’re still expected to do despite no one checking it. Dates are often wholly wrong or mixed up from prior semesters, this often lead to both groups of teachers attempting to communicate with each other to find the correct date since it was like roulette if the tutors would answer your emails.

Practice Teaching: This was fine, generally students were easy to get along with and were excited to be present. The Upper-Intermediate level was a slight struggle only because there were often only 3-4 students when the minimum was stated to be 6, this is the only reason I’m taking off a point.

Quality of Feedback: This is a mixed bag. I was lucky that the other teachers I was with were very supportive and uplifting and my final tutor of the course was a gem. The beginning of the course was a different story, our initial tutor was confusing, contradictory, and overall terrible at motivating the teachers to do better. I don’t know if this tutor was planning to leave TH, but he really seemed like he didn’t want to be there. Additionally, he consistently had microphone issues that affected how we heard him and he refused to switch to the high quality mic he informed us he had on his final day. Going as far to blame one teacher’s keyboard for his microphone issues. He was impossible to reach outside of class, emails went unanswered entirely.

Lesson Plan Guidance: The two-star rating here should not be “fair” but rather “poor” with one-star being “terrible”. There is very little lesson plan guidance, you’re given about 15 minutes before class on designated days before the teachers teach. This was especially difficult for Monday’s and Tuesday’s teachers as they only had a day between teaching and planning enough to receive decent guidance on Wed/Thurs. Additionally, lesson frameworks (basic skeletons to help make planning easier depending on the type of lesson) weren’t introduced until almost 6 weeks into the course. These frameworks were very useful and it truly was a detriment to early lessons to not allow students access to these. I have no idea why they weren’t introduced sooner.

Instructor Competency: Overall, I only found one tutor helpful and that was Hulgo. He truly did his best to uplift students and teachers while they were struggling and learning. He had a very positive attitude and his criticisms all felt fair, especially since he offered guidance on how to fix them most of the time. I found everyone prior to paying for the course pleasant too, my interviewer was very nice and I enjoyed speaking with her. Everything aside from these, I would rather forget. If you struggle with a tutor that isn’t doing their job and is largely incompetent, the higher ups will simply tell you to suck it up or even laugh at concerns/comments when they call you over the phone. They do not care on that level at all.

I’m not applicable for the bottom two ratings, but overall I would call my time at Teaching House disappointing. Every week I ended up reminding myself how close I was to being done, I found very little of it actually enjoyable. If you are looking to take the CELTA course, please do not do it with Teaching House. Save yourself the headache.

Review 269 of 270 Teaching House

97%
Overall Rating
Course Content
Practice Teaching
Quality of Feedback
Lesson Plan Guidance
Instructor Competency
Job Assistance
Not Applicable
Facilities/Resources
Not Applicable

Truly a wonderful experience. It’s a lot of work but I learned so much and the practice with students was really great.

Review 268 of 270 Teaching House

93%
Overall Rating
Course Content
Practice Teaching
Quality of Feedback
Lesson Plan Guidance
Instructor Competency
Job Assistance
Facilities/Resources

My part-time Online CELTA course was a fantastic experience. It was challenging and deeply rewarding. The course is well-structured, the tutors are experts in the field of ELT and CELTA lesson design and delivery, and the students (sister students and the real students who attend Teaching Practices) are truly wonderful.

I didn’t expect the curriculum to be so intense, nor did I realize that trainee teachers would start teaching from the second week! But the combination of rigor, structure, excellent instruction, and practical application of new knowledge made CELTA a thrill. I watched myself and my peers grow exponentially with each week’s demands.

If you’re eager to learn how to teach English to adult learners, and you enjoy highly stimulating and intense learning environments, I encourage you to consider a Teaching House CELTA course!

Review 267 of 270 Teaching House

100%
Overall Rating
Course Content
Practice Teaching
Quality of Feedback
Lesson Plan Guidance
Instructor Competency
Job Assistance
Facilities/Resources

I came with 0% interactive teaching experience. I only had lecture experience as a career job. This was a whole new world. I appreciate everything Abeer and Judy (instructor) did to help us along and provide us with the tools to teach. I came into the course with a “will not fail” attitude.

A word of warning…this course has a lot of work. Many, many weekends and week nights working on lesson plans and language analysis work. This is not for those who can give 10 hrs a week to this. It’s very, very hard and should be for a level 5 certification. Worth it in the end.

Good luck and enjoy the ride.

Review 266 of 270 Teaching House

88%
Overall Rating
Course Content
Practice Teaching
Quality of Feedback
Lesson Plan Guidance
Instructor Competency
Job Assistance
Facilities/Resources

I’ve made the wisest decision since I chose to take CELTA in TH! I hope this centre will gain more popularity in the near future.

Review 265 of 270 Teaching House

85%
Overall Rating
Course Content
Practice Teaching
Quality of Feedback
Lesson Plan Guidance
Instructor Competency
Job Assistance
Facilities/Resources

Teaching House is an amazing organization and I am grateful I completed by CELTA certificate through them. I would recommend using Teaching House to anyone interested in ESL. The tutors were excellent and the teaching practice was very practical!

Review 264 of 270 Teaching House

100%
Overall Rating
Course Content
Practice Teaching
Quality of Feedback
Lesson Plan Guidance
Instructor Competency
Job Assistance
Facilities/Resources

Overall, Teaching House’s CELTA course is excellent. I work full-time (unrelated to ELT), so I took the 11-week part-time mixed-mode course, which required 3 evenings of participation per week (sessions started at 5:30pm and would go until about 9pm). Besides those three evenings, a lot of time was required on my own for lesson preparation, written assignments, online Moodle Units (which introduced very helpful teaching concepts). Our two Tutors were absolutely fantastic guides! One started us off with a great foundation for the first couple of weeks (all Zoom), then the other the next four (Zoom then in-person), and then the first Tutor saw us through the last weeks (all in-person). Though they were unified in their commitment to preparing us according to CELTA’s standards, their individual experiences led to slightly different approaches, which was great for us since we got to see (and then incorporate) various tried-and-true methods of achieving the same teaching goals. Teaching House’s staff is friendly, and they obviously know what they’re doing in terms of getting the word out to volunteer learners, both online and in-person, because we were never without learners. My advice to potential trainees: If you’re doing the mixed-mode version, please make sure you take advantage of TH’s tutorial videos on how to teach via Zoom (especially on managing Breakout Rooms). Learning how to teach with Zoom is a huge plus because the reality is that teachers and students won’t always be able to physically meet and many jobs are for online teaching, only – and this is not a graded skill, so having the opportunity to learn it is purely a benefit. Also, although the course is well organized, success will still depend highly on your ability to manage very limited time, especially if you work full-time. So, *before* the course starts (maybe about a month or more before), I highly suggest reading the two recommended textbooks, and starting the Moodle Units (as soon as the Tutors give you access). When the course starts, it really takes off; so, the more you’re familiar with terminology and concepts before it starts, the less scrambling you’ll have to do and the better you’ll be able to absorb the mountains of material given to you at each session. Last but definitely not least, we fellow trainees supported each other emotionally and logistically, and I believe that made a big difference. Well done, Teaching House, for providing a well-structured program.

Review 263 of 270 Teaching House

100%
Overall Rating
Course Content
Practice Teaching
Quality of Feedback
Lesson Plan Guidance
Instructor Competency
Job Assistance
Facilities/Resources

Great course! I feel like I learned a lot having absolutely 0 experience as a teacher going in. I feel confident in using what I learned in my career as a teacher and would definitely come back to take more advanced courses!

Review 262 of 270 Teaching House

100%
Overall Rating
Course Content
Practice Teaching
Quality of Feedback
Lesson Plan Guidance
Instructor Competency
Job Assistance
Facilities/Resources

I took the CELTA course and my experience was wonderful from beginning to end. Everything before it started was easy to do because the staff are super helpful and kind. I learned a lot and super fast because the tutors are amazing, they give specific advice for everything, so I could deliver better lessons every time. By the end of if I was confident at delivering all type of lessons.

Review 261 of 270 Teaching House

93%
Overall Rating
Course Content
Practice Teaching
Quality of Feedback
Lesson Plan Guidance
Instructor Competency
Job Assistance
Facilities/Resources

I had heard that the CELTA course given by Teaching House gave excellent training and was intense. I found both to be true. The input sessions (lectures) were very informative and practical–they were directly applicable to what you needed to do to prepare and and to deliver your teaching practice lessons, which for me were the most valuable part of the course. Preparing and delivering these lessons took a lot of time and effort and for me it was the main reason the course was intense and time-consuming. But the teaching practice was also the most valuable part of the course in getting me to learn the material and improve my teaching skills. I learned so much from the feedback I received on my teaching both from the tutor and my colleagues. I found my colleagues to be very supportive and fun to work with–definitely another major plus of the course. All of the tutors were very supportive–they want you to succeed in the course. They were very good at guiding you and very responsive to questions emailed outside of class hours. One thing that could have made the course less intense would have been to spread the course content over 5 weeks instead of 4. But overall I am very happy that I took the course, despite the intensity and how much work it ended up being.

Write a Review of Teaching House

Overall Rating
Course Content
Practice Teaching
Quality of Feedback
Lesson Plan Guidance
Instructor Competency
Job Assistance
Facilities/Resources
Writing Tips

Remember, by definition a review is a critical assessment or evaluation.

Explain why you hold your opinions– include specifics.

Include both pros and cons.

Balance a raving review with a suggestion for improvement or something you’d do differently if you took the course over again.

Balance a negative review by adding at least one positive aspect about your experience.

Avoid any language that may be perceived as slander.

Use a valid email address*– we may try to contact you if your review is disputed by the course provider.

Please do not submit a review until you have completed all modules, tests, and other course components, or are no longer actively registered at Teaching House.

Current or former employees of Teaching House, even if the employee was previously a student at Teaching House, may not submit a review.

Content copied and pasted from another website will not be accepted. If a duplicate review is found elsewhere on the web, it will be removed from TEFLCourseReview.

Write at least a few sentences about your experience with Teaching House. Reviews containing only generic comments will not be published.

Reviews that contain slanderous, libelous, defamatory, offensive, obscene, racist, abusive, vulgar, or otherwise inappropriate remarks or unprofessional language will not be accepted.

Reviews which violate a third party's right to privacy, that contain private or personal information, such as the phone number, address, email address, or other information which identifies a private individual without the explicit consent of that person will not be accepted.

Do not post links to the school's website, to other URLs promoting their services, or to the services of competing businesses.

Please submit your review from your home, workplace, or other off-campus location. Reviews submitted from the campus of Teaching House will not be approved.

TEFL Course Review